Join me on Saturday, June 6, 2009 as I welcome Pegine Echevarria, former girl gang member turned scholar, entrepreneur, author, and speaker. She has been inducted into the motivational speakers hall of fame. Also on that show we will have Otis Lyons (aka Vegas Don), who founded a street gang in Durham, NC some years ago. Today Vegas tours the country with a powerful anti-gang message and is giving back to the community that he took from through gang activity. We will also welcome Investigator Griffin of the Albany,Georgia gang task force to give us his take on the impact of gangs in smaller towns and communities. You don't want to miss this episode!
Saturday, May 30, 2009
Monday, May 25, 2009
Republicans Make Me Ashamed And I'm A Democrat! By The Way, Democrats are Christians Too!
This is probably the most serious blog that I've ever written. It may very well be the most serious blog I'll ever write. I'm writing this one out of the depth of my heart, my soul, my mind, and my spirit. I'm troubled. I'm really troubled and writing this blog allows me the opportunity to confront and release.
I've never been interested in following politics. At least not until 2008. Sure, I've voted in the past, watched a few speeches in the past, and wore campaign buttons in the past. The difference was that I really didn't care if my candidate won or not. After all, a politician is a politician and they all think alike right? I mean, they all promise you milk and honey but deliver crackers and water don't they?
I've never paid much attention to Democrats or Republicans. Oh sure, I know they have opposing views on issues such as abortion, taxes, gay marriages, the role of government, etc. I've always known that. But I chose a candidate on how he looked--his image. I didn't care if he was Republican, Democrat or the two-headed freak Republicrat or Demoblican. If the guy looked sincere, sounded sincere, and acted as though he really cared about my general welfare, he had me. I went to the polls, voted for him, pinned on the "I voted" button, and returned home to await the next election cycle. That simple.
But politics turn a drastic turn for me in 2008. Hillary Clinton was running for President. Wow! A woman and someone I genuinely liked. I loved Bill Clinton as President. Bill was smooth and he could play that saxophone! Bill was likable, he seemed to be concerned for the welfare of all Americans. To me, it didn't get any better than Bill and Hillary Clinton. So guess what? I threw my whole support behind the former First Lady. A woman would be more willing to listen and not throw testosterone or testicular fits. She would reason and not be hasty. She would balance the budget with ease. She would stand before foreign dignitaries with grace and power. She would be reluctant to declare war but rather compromise and make the two parties shake hands and be friends. You know, like all moms do. But then something happened. A subtle, gentle breeze blew in this Senator from Chicago. He flashed a million dollar, winning smile and a mind so brilliant that Einstein could be sent to a special education class.
Who is this guy attempting to steal the Clinton's thunder? Who is this handsome black guy with the beautiful black family? What makes this dude think that he can possibly do what Jesse Jackson couldn't do? Become President? Yeah, right. I didn't like him. I'd read all the rumors on the net about his religion (Muslim), his heritage (Kenyan), and his ties to colorful characters like Tony Rezko and Bill Ayers. Hmmm. He's cool and all, but he can't beat my girl Hillary. Go Hillary!
I rejected everything about Barack Obama. His name was goofy and sounded un-american. His ears were big. He was from Hawaii. Is that really part of the United States? Hillary did well for a while. But then she made the ultimate mistake in my opinion. She cried. She cried when she lost the Iowa caucus. Now, my mind began to change. She can't cry or become emotional as President. God, how would that be perceived by those tyrants and despots like the leaders of Iran, North Korea, and Iraq? They would have her for dinner and use her bones for toothpicks.
I turned a slow, reluctant ear towards this guy from Chicago. He was fighting an uphill battle. I still didn't like him a whole lot but I did find him interesting. The media and most Americans swore that he couldn't win. "America would rather have a white woman than a black man in the white house" I'd hear often. Yet, he continued on. He was loaded with information and armed with deep knowledge of American politics. He was for real. He was undeterred and completely focused. Mud was thrown at him frequently. He would wipe it off and smile at the slingers, promising to be a President to all--even those who dirtied his clothes.
I began to thaw. The Jeremiah Wright thing had to be the ultimate Obama-killer right? Sorry, that was wrong. It only proved to be a temporary distraction. His momentum continued and his supporters grew. I was becoming a puddle of water. This guy was winning me over. Why? I-m-a-g-e. He began to look quite presidential and I began to envision him in the oval office. I'm getting to the whole embarrassed by Republicans, Democrats are Christians too issue. Bear with me here. I told you that this is going to be a serious blog.
I'm not necessarily anti-Republican or pro-Democrat. As I mentioned before, the guy with the best image got my vote. But the Republicans today, particularly those of the conservative bunch, are making fools of themselves in many ways. I am extremely embarrassed by those representing the Republican party. Who could possibly be proud of Rush Limbaugh? Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich or Michael Steele? You don't have to be an Obama supporter to be respectful of the office. I have never in my life seen such blatant disrespect for a Commander-in-Chief as I've seen towards this President. As a veteran of the U.S. Armed Forces, it is a despicable thing to witness. And no, George W. was not treated this horribly!
The aforementioned bunch, bombard the airwaves with misleading information, half-truths, and outright lies. The bitterness and hatred that they have for President Obama causes them to go into these rants of insanity, complete with swollen veins and bulging eyes. They oppose each and everything that the President does with no forethought. Cheney and Gingrich didn't speak this much when they were relevant! Cheney needs to shut his pie hole, Gingrich needs to seek therapy, Limbaugh needs to become the "biggest loser," and Steele, well, he needs to research the word "token." I'm sure he'll find his name right next to it. No one, not even those in his party, really respects this guy. They thought he'd be the answer to Obama to stop his momentum but they quickly learned that Steele was way out of his league.
These guys are so deprived of political oxygen that they're flailing around like fish out of water. Who can take them seriously? They appear (and remember my position about image) incompetent, unsure, disjointed and divided. At this point they couldn't lead a team of toddler ball players. It certainly doesn't help that they constantly oppose the President without cause.
Regarding abortion and homosexuality, I oppose both. Yes, this liberal democrat is against abortion and homosexuality. Why? Because they are both biblical no-nos. Conservatives want to scream and holler about their religious beliefs when it comes to homosexuals. But they're forgetting one important thing. If they read the bible they'll see where it is already written: Romans 1:26-27: "For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet." This scriptures let's me know that homosexuality is a reality and that consequences as a result will come. My point? Although homosexuality is indeed wrong, it is a choice to be made by individuals. So many want to point to the "founding fathers and constitution" to bolster their arguments about what should and should not happen in America. But choice is something that comes along with freedom. And at last check, people in this country are free to choose.
Even God himself does not make man serve him. Instead, he gives man choices and hopes that he makes the right decisions. Consider these scriptures: “I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live.” (Deuteronomy 30:19)
“And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.” (Joshua 24:15)
“Envy thou not the oppressor, and choose none of his ways.” (Proverbs 3:31)
“Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.” (James 4:17) (If we had no choice, then knowing to do good would necessarily result in doing good.)
My point here is that homosexuality is indeed a choice and not a freak occurrence at conception and with that being the case, the President or no one else has the authority to tell these folks what they can do with their individual liberties. It is God's job to judge and He will do just that. Some Republicans are now directing their hostility, bitterness, and rage at President Obama's choice for the Supreme Court, Sonia Sotomayor. They have gone as far as call her a bigot and racist based on a comment she made years ago that was taken out of context. Rush Limbaugh took this one and ran. Well, he probably trotted because his big frame certainly can't handle running. Newt Gingrich added his unsolicited "two cents," and Pat Buchanan, the old gentlemen who really needs to get a clue, verbally attacked her as well. Do these Republicans know that the general public is watching them and concluding that "Insanity in the Ranks" is their slogan and the straight jacket their new symbol?
I'm embarrassed by the GOP. It is one thing to try and become relevant and respected again. It is quite another to try and do so by any means necessary. The American public is smart enough to identify a game, gimmick, plot or ploy. We won't have our minds manipulated or intelligence insulted. There are many well-respected Republican politicians in Washington, DC and around the globe. It would behoove the party to hunt one, tie him up, and thrust him kicking and screaming before the public if they want to become real contenders and party of relevance.
AfterThoughts Signing Off...
I've never been interested in following politics. At least not until 2008. Sure, I've voted in the past, watched a few speeches in the past, and wore campaign buttons in the past. The difference was that I really didn't care if my candidate won or not. After all, a politician is a politician and they all think alike right? I mean, they all promise you milk and honey but deliver crackers and water don't they?
I've never paid much attention to Democrats or Republicans. Oh sure, I know they have opposing views on issues such as abortion, taxes, gay marriages, the role of government, etc. I've always known that. But I chose a candidate on how he looked--his image. I didn't care if he was Republican, Democrat or the two-headed freak Republicrat or Demoblican. If the guy looked sincere, sounded sincere, and acted as though he really cared about my general welfare, he had me. I went to the polls, voted for him, pinned on the "I voted" button, and returned home to await the next election cycle. That simple.
But politics turn a drastic turn for me in 2008. Hillary Clinton was running for President. Wow! A woman and someone I genuinely liked. I loved Bill Clinton as President. Bill was smooth and he could play that saxophone! Bill was likable, he seemed to be concerned for the welfare of all Americans. To me, it didn't get any better than Bill and Hillary Clinton. So guess what? I threw my whole support behind the former First Lady. A woman would be more willing to listen and not throw testosterone or testicular fits. She would reason and not be hasty. She would balance the budget with ease. She would stand before foreign dignitaries with grace and power. She would be reluctant to declare war but rather compromise and make the two parties shake hands and be friends. You know, like all moms do. But then something happened. A subtle, gentle breeze blew in this Senator from Chicago. He flashed a million dollar, winning smile and a mind so brilliant that Einstein could be sent to a special education class.
Who is this guy attempting to steal the Clinton's thunder? Who is this handsome black guy with the beautiful black family? What makes this dude think that he can possibly do what Jesse Jackson couldn't do? Become President? Yeah, right. I didn't like him. I'd read all the rumors on the net about his religion (Muslim), his heritage (Kenyan), and his ties to colorful characters like Tony Rezko and Bill Ayers. Hmmm. He's cool and all, but he can't beat my girl Hillary. Go Hillary!
I rejected everything about Barack Obama. His name was goofy and sounded un-american. His ears were big. He was from Hawaii. Is that really part of the United States? Hillary did well for a while. But then she made the ultimate mistake in my opinion. She cried. She cried when she lost the Iowa caucus. Now, my mind began to change. She can't cry or become emotional as President. God, how would that be perceived by those tyrants and despots like the leaders of Iran, North Korea, and Iraq? They would have her for dinner and use her bones for toothpicks.
I turned a slow, reluctant ear towards this guy from Chicago. He was fighting an uphill battle. I still didn't like him a whole lot but I did find him interesting. The media and most Americans swore that he couldn't win. "America would rather have a white woman than a black man in the white house" I'd hear often. Yet, he continued on. He was loaded with information and armed with deep knowledge of American politics. He was for real. He was undeterred and completely focused. Mud was thrown at him frequently. He would wipe it off and smile at the slingers, promising to be a President to all--even those who dirtied his clothes.
I began to thaw. The Jeremiah Wright thing had to be the ultimate Obama-killer right? Sorry, that was wrong. It only proved to be a temporary distraction. His momentum continued and his supporters grew. I was becoming a puddle of water. This guy was winning me over. Why? I-m-a-g-e. He began to look quite presidential and I began to envision him in the oval office. I'm getting to the whole embarrassed by Republicans, Democrats are Christians too issue. Bear with me here. I told you that this is going to be a serious blog.
I'm not necessarily anti-Republican or pro-Democrat. As I mentioned before, the guy with the best image got my vote. But the Republicans today, particularly those of the conservative bunch, are making fools of themselves in many ways. I am extremely embarrassed by those representing the Republican party. Who could possibly be proud of Rush Limbaugh? Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich or Michael Steele? You don't have to be an Obama supporter to be respectful of the office. I have never in my life seen such blatant disrespect for a Commander-in-Chief as I've seen towards this President. As a veteran of the U.S. Armed Forces, it is a despicable thing to witness. And no, George W. was not treated this horribly!
The aforementioned bunch, bombard the airwaves with misleading information, half-truths, and outright lies. The bitterness and hatred that they have for President Obama causes them to go into these rants of insanity, complete with swollen veins and bulging eyes. They oppose each and everything that the President does with no forethought. Cheney and Gingrich didn't speak this much when they were relevant! Cheney needs to shut his pie hole, Gingrich needs to seek therapy, Limbaugh needs to become the "biggest loser," and Steele, well, he needs to research the word "token." I'm sure he'll find his name right next to it. No one, not even those in his party, really respects this guy. They thought he'd be the answer to Obama to stop his momentum but they quickly learned that Steele was way out of his league.
These guys are so deprived of political oxygen that they're flailing around like fish out of water. Who can take them seriously? They appear (and remember my position about image) incompetent, unsure, disjointed and divided. At this point they couldn't lead a team of toddler ball players. It certainly doesn't help that they constantly oppose the President without cause.
Regarding abortion and homosexuality, I oppose both. Yes, this liberal democrat is against abortion and homosexuality. Why? Because they are both biblical no-nos. Conservatives want to scream and holler about their religious beliefs when it comes to homosexuals. But they're forgetting one important thing. If they read the bible they'll see where it is already written: Romans 1:26-27: "For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature: And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was meet." This scriptures let's me know that homosexuality is a reality and that consequences as a result will come. My point? Although homosexuality is indeed wrong, it is a choice to be made by individuals. So many want to point to the "founding fathers and constitution" to bolster their arguments about what should and should not happen in America. But choice is something that comes along with freedom. And at last check, people in this country are free to choose.
Even God himself does not make man serve him. Instead, he gives man choices and hopes that he makes the right decisions. Consider these scriptures: “I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live.” (Deuteronomy 30:19)
“And if it seem evil unto you to serve the LORD, choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.” (Joshua 24:15)
“Envy thou not the oppressor, and choose none of his ways.” (Proverbs 3:31)
“Therefore to him that knoweth to do good, and doeth it not, to him it is sin.” (James 4:17) (If we had no choice, then knowing to do good would necessarily result in doing good.)
My point here is that homosexuality is indeed a choice and not a freak occurrence at conception and with that being the case, the President or no one else has the authority to tell these folks what they can do with their individual liberties. It is God's job to judge and He will do just that. Some Republicans are now directing their hostility, bitterness, and rage at President Obama's choice for the Supreme Court, Sonia Sotomayor. They have gone as far as call her a bigot and racist based on a comment she made years ago that was taken out of context. Rush Limbaugh took this one and ran. Well, he probably trotted because his big frame certainly can't handle running. Newt Gingrich added his unsolicited "two cents," and Pat Buchanan, the old gentlemen who really needs to get a clue, verbally attacked her as well. Do these Republicans know that the general public is watching them and concluding that "Insanity in the Ranks" is their slogan and the straight jacket their new symbol?
I'm embarrassed by the GOP. It is one thing to try and become relevant and respected again. It is quite another to try and do so by any means necessary. The American public is smart enough to identify a game, gimmick, plot or ploy. We won't have our minds manipulated or intelligence insulted. There are many well-respected Republican politicians in Washington, DC and around the globe. It would behoove the party to hunt one, tie him up, and thrust him kicking and screaming before the public if they want to become real contenders and party of relevance.
AfterThoughts Signing Off...
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
America Underestimated The Power Of Image and Hope
It's all about image. And on November 4, 2008, image adorned herself in a sea of red, white, and blue, proclaiming loudly and boldly: "Change has come to America! Now is the time to depart from the political status quo! Now is the time to seek common ground as we embrace a new direction, a new era, and a renewed hope in the greatness of this nation!" Change opened the heart of America. Image opened the eyes of America. Hope opened the heart of America.
You see, it really wasn't the Republican's message that was so brutally rejected. They talked a pretty good game. They promised lower taxes, stood firmly against abortion and gay marriages, and ran on a platform of experience. Mr. McCain was tough. The war hero instilled a sense of pride and gratitude in most Americans when recalling his grueling days as a POW. One would have to be a devil incarnate not to feel a sense of gratitude to Senator McCain for his very unselfish sacrifice while protecting this nation during war. So what was rejected? Why did many Independents and some Republicans turn away from the GOP and to the Democrats in the 2008 Presidential election? Five letters, two syllables: IMAGE. Four letters, one syllable. HOPE.
During the election, Image said that Repbulicans were racist, bitter, and fearful of anything new and different. McCain's town hall meetings (pre-Palin) were dry, boring, and lacked substance. The crowds were so thin that he could have fit them all at his dinner table. After selecting Palin as a running mate, the much larger crowds at the rallies showed racist attitudes and called for harm to come to Senator Obama. The McCain/Palin ticket did little to stop it. For the Democrats, Image said that they were caring, compassionate, intelligent, and refreshing. America was ready to see something different, say something different, and be something different. Image afforded them that great opportunity.
Anything that Image was unable to do, hope brought home. Hope blanketed the nation as a quick moving snowstorm; beautiful to behold and strong enough to cripple entire states. Hope was not the result of blind following, party loyalty, or racial preference. It was the anxious desire to see a nation guilty of the bondage and oppression of human beings correct her wrongs. It was the belief that the last can become first--that equality was not just a dream yet to be fulfilled.
Barack Obama's amazing ability to connect with the hearts of Americans strengthened hope. In him was the hope that the family home of 30+ years could be saved from foreclosure, that the family salary would be able to survive the economic crisis, that the ailing elderly person would be able to continue obtaining life-sustaining medications, that young people in this country could still attend college, and that loved ones fighting the deceptive, senseless war in Iraq would soon return home. His unwillingness to back down or give up when negative news reports saturated the airwaves opened the closed doors of hope, allowing it to break forth with power.
Pretty speeches and racial support did not and could not deliver victory to Obama on a silver platter. Although they certainly had their place in the campaign and election, it was ultimately America's desire to see and welcome change that trounced the GOP and deprived them of political oxygen.
Image broke the back of the GOP. Hope was the stretcher that carried them away.
AfterThoughts Signing Off...
You see, it really wasn't the Republican's message that was so brutally rejected. They talked a pretty good game. They promised lower taxes, stood firmly against abortion and gay marriages, and ran on a platform of experience. Mr. McCain was tough. The war hero instilled a sense of pride and gratitude in most Americans when recalling his grueling days as a POW. One would have to be a devil incarnate not to feel a sense of gratitude to Senator McCain for his very unselfish sacrifice while protecting this nation during war. So what was rejected? Why did many Independents and some Republicans turn away from the GOP and to the Democrats in the 2008 Presidential election? Five letters, two syllables: IMAGE. Four letters, one syllable. HOPE.
During the election, Image said that Repbulicans were racist, bitter, and fearful of anything new and different. McCain's town hall meetings (pre-Palin) were dry, boring, and lacked substance. The crowds were so thin that he could have fit them all at his dinner table. After selecting Palin as a running mate, the much larger crowds at the rallies showed racist attitudes and called for harm to come to Senator Obama. The McCain/Palin ticket did little to stop it. For the Democrats, Image said that they were caring, compassionate, intelligent, and refreshing. America was ready to see something different, say something different, and be something different. Image afforded them that great opportunity.
Anything that Image was unable to do, hope brought home. Hope blanketed the nation as a quick moving snowstorm; beautiful to behold and strong enough to cripple entire states. Hope was not the result of blind following, party loyalty, or racial preference. It was the anxious desire to see a nation guilty of the bondage and oppression of human beings correct her wrongs. It was the belief that the last can become first--that equality was not just a dream yet to be fulfilled.
Barack Obama's amazing ability to connect with the hearts of Americans strengthened hope. In him was the hope that the family home of 30+ years could be saved from foreclosure, that the family salary would be able to survive the economic crisis, that the ailing elderly person would be able to continue obtaining life-sustaining medications, that young people in this country could still attend college, and that loved ones fighting the deceptive, senseless war in Iraq would soon return home. His unwillingness to back down or give up when negative news reports saturated the airwaves opened the closed doors of hope, allowing it to break forth with power.
Pretty speeches and racial support did not and could not deliver victory to Obama on a silver platter. Although they certainly had their place in the campaign and election, it was ultimately America's desire to see and welcome change that trounced the GOP and deprived them of political oxygen.
Image broke the back of the GOP. Hope was the stretcher that carried them away.
AfterThoughts Signing Off...
Sunday, May 17, 2009
I Know Why Barack Obama Is President
Never Underestimate The Power Of Hope
From the start, the odds were against him. A virtual unknown. An inexperienced Senator from Illinois. A half black man rumored to be a Muslim. A Christian under the leadership of a black, radical Pastor. A man in America with a very Muslim, foreign sounding name. An American? Indonesian? Kenyan? What's on the birth certificate? Although viewed with some skepticism, he was followed with intrigue.
When Barack H. Obama threw his name into the political ring to compete for the Presidency of the United States, very few took him seriously. After all, he had to go up against some stiff competition--H. Clinton, J. Edwards, J. Biden, C. Dodd, D. Kucinich, and B. Richardson. Surely that guy with the weird name would succumb to the popularity and power of say, Hillary Clinton and Chris Dodd.
But perseverance ruled the day. Barack Obama was neither intimidated or reluctant to press forward in his goal to be America's Commander-in-Chief. He was ridiculed in some ways, mocked in others. Along the way he lost friends and acquaintances. Yet, his focus remained on Pennsylvania Avenue. He trotted along, like that little engine that could, amid death threats, and open hostility. When the field was finally narrowed down to two, Obama and Clinton, a shift began. Barack Obama was now a serious contender for the oval office, and all eyes were on him.
Hillary Clinton supporters were at a loss for words. This was not supposed to happen. She was expected to lock up the nomination and send baby boy Obama packing, with his thumb in his mouth, back to Chicago until he "grew up some more" and matured politically. However, the delegate numbers that he began racking up was a force to be reckoned with and ultimately proved to be too much for the former First Lady.
Once he defeated the popular and well-liked Hillary Clinton, jaws dropped and hearts stopped. He beat Hillary Clinton? Wow. As with the Tea Baggers, the PUMA movement (party unity my a--) used the occasion to rally anti-Obama voters across the nation. Bitter, hateful, divisive, vitriolic feelings peppered the nation. Many Hillary supporters threatened to vote Republican before supporting Barack Obama. Still undeterred, Obama looked forward to his next fight; his next victim. The aging Senator from Arizona and war hero, John McCain.
By now, Mr. Obama had acquired the attention of the entire nation, the world even. Could it be? Could it possibly happen? Could a man of African descent actually defeat his opponent and become leader of the free world? The skeptics remained. They would not be silenced. But in spite of it all, he stayed on course.
His unwillingness to give up or be "punked down" by political heavyweights, strengthened his character and resolve. His "youth," hippiness, and ability to connect to any and every voting bloc and constituent made him an icon of sorts. Young people begin to take notice. Black people began to listen. Whites, Latinos, and Asians began to pay attention. His speeches and mantra of "change" began to instill hope and excitement. Black Americans held their breath while daring to believe; afraid that they would be rudely awakened from a beautiful dream. Hope left the shores of Africa in the belly of slaves. Hope was tossed to and fro during the voyage to America, yet it survived and firmly fastened itself to the spirits of African captives in America. Hope endured the lash. Hope would bend but never break when the sun's heat beamed violently down upon the heads of slaves. Hope would caress the mother who was torn from her children and ripped from her husband during slave trades. Hope would catch the tears that flowed from eyes that could only see bondage as freedom became a fading memory.
And so, Barack Obama stayed the course. Hope's power increased. Obama connected in an unprecedented manner with voters across the land. He used technology to his advantage; reaching millions of unregistered voters. Something new and exciting was sweeping the nation. How could the momentum be stopped? Republicans and others who opposed the fresh, new movement dug up everything but the bones of Judas Iscariot to cripple Obama's candidacy. At times it seemed that they would prevail. Jeremiah Wright became an Achilles heel. Obama's reference to small town citizens clinging to guns and religions became a daily talking point. His wife Michelle's "For the first time in my adult life" statement sent political pundits and commentators into a complete frenzy, not to mention stupor. None were able to derail the plan.
As election night 2008 drew closer, hope increased. With each debate, hope became more bold. And finally, hope transformed herself into victory. Obama's victory was not his alone. No, it wasn't. The victory belonged to those who wanted to see a break from the norm in America. It belonged to those who wanted to see real change come to a nation that operated on deceptive political agendas. It belonged to those who lived under the heavy hand of oppression and intolerance, injustice and inhumane treatments. The election of Barack Obama would be the reparation that would bring equality to a divided states of America. Or would it?
To Be Continued...
AfterThoughts Signing Off...
Partisan Politics: The New Civil War
Americans are no longer fighting two wars, but three. Two are on foreign soil--Iraq and Afghanistan. The other is right here in America. In some ways, the domestic war that's being fought is much more intense than the two abroad.
Although political fights and wrestling matches are not new to Americans, this current round is so full of bitterness, opposition, and hatred, that it appears to be unlike anything that we've witnessed in modern times. With the passing of each new day, and emergence of any new issues, the fight becomes more intense and dangerous.
For starters, the culprits (the schoolyard bullies) need to be identified. It is their interference and stronghold that keeps the fight alive, with no exit or strategy for victory. They are: misinformation, tainted information, lack of knowledge, self-righteousness, unethical behaviors, and hidden agendas. This six-pack of dynamite, if left unchallenged, is poised to detonate and blast bipartisan efforts into further oblivion.
There is so much mudslinging and name calling from the left and right that the middle ground is caught in the crossfire and looking for cover. The absence of the middle makes the body of politics a freak of nature. Without a middle (chest) the left and right arms can not function, have nothing to connect to, and serves very little purpose. They both fall helplessly to the ground. The middle keeps the left and right grounded, not letting any side gain an unfair upper hand, but allowing both sides to carry out their functions for the good of the body.
Barack Obama is the 44th President of the United States. We know that. Most of us accept it. He has managed to keep most of his campaign promises and those that he hasn't comes as no surprise. Most Americans are intelligent enough to know what can and will work versus what can't and won't. In the humble opinion of one American, I believe that he is doing a pretty good job with what he's been given. He doesn't come off as angry or bitter. Instead, he seems to be methodically and carefully considering the best interests of this nation. George W. Bush is no longer President of the United States. We know that. All of us accept it because he reached his two term maximum. He governed in accordance with the beliefs and ideals of the Republican right. I'm not sure if his governance was motivated by a desire to effectively lead and represent the American public, or to secure a legacy for himself and scrub the stains from the tainted one of his father, Bush 41. I'm still pondering that one.
Although Bush 43 walked out of office and the public eye nearly 120 days ago, residue from his Administration remains. An unstable economy, high rate of home foreclosures, job losses, financial disasters and more, rests heavily upon the backs and minds of many Americans. Obama comes in, assesses the damage, and looks for ways to stop the bleeding until solutions can be found. However, political rancor rips away the band-aid, exposing the deep wound to more infection, until the situation becomes gravely ill.
Who's right? Is it the Republicans who say the stimulus and bailouts will only lead to more financial and economic disasters later down the road? Or the Democrats who say we have to act now or the country goes from a moderate recession to an acute depression? Who do we believe? Who is more sincere? Who seems to genuinely care about the state of America?
Well, after considering all the talk, analysis, press conferences, news articles, blogs, and opinion polls, this American decided to support the Democratic position. No, I didn't do it based on party affiliation or political popularity. I didn't do it because of the "still-quite-popular" President Obama or the influential First Lady Michelle Obama. For me, image was the deciding factor.
Although the Republicans seemed passionate about their position, their reaction to the crisis was superficial. Sure, they took advantage of photo ops and sound bites to oppose the democratic agenda for the "good of our children and grandchildren" years from now. I listened intently to their commentaries. I looked for sincerity and concern. I found little. What I found abundantly was consistent rejection with little or no thought or consideration. The answer to every Democratic proposal was an emphatic no. Now, when people are forced from their homes, struggle to feed their families, lose their jobs, and face hopeless situations daily, partisan wrestling matches and street brawls does not cast a positive light on leaders. The American public depends on elected officials to make their lives better, and when that fails to happen, consequences abound. The heat of battle rises. The civil war rages. Generals and Commanders are clueless and have difficulty devising a winning strategy.
The negativity and bitterness surrounding the Republican party is destroying credibility. Some times less is definitely more. The airwaves are saturated with divisive, venomous rhetoric from the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck, Lou Dobbs, Michelle Bachmann, Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich and others. Democrats are not much better. They are in the political driver's seat at the moment but they keep looking in the rearview mirror, often suffering avoidable crashes. In the process, the American people suffer. Image is everything. When your words say "I care" and your image says, "so what?" you can best believe that those bearing tainted images will see a political freefall in 2010 and 2012.
AfterThoughts Signing Off...
Although political fights and wrestling matches are not new to Americans, this current round is so full of bitterness, opposition, and hatred, that it appears to be unlike anything that we've witnessed in modern times. With the passing of each new day, and emergence of any new issues, the fight becomes more intense and dangerous.
For starters, the culprits (the schoolyard bullies) need to be identified. It is their interference and stronghold that keeps the fight alive, with no exit or strategy for victory. They are: misinformation, tainted information, lack of knowledge, self-righteousness, unethical behaviors, and hidden agendas. This six-pack of dynamite, if left unchallenged, is poised to detonate and blast bipartisan efforts into further oblivion.
There is so much mudslinging and name calling from the left and right that the middle ground is caught in the crossfire and looking for cover. The absence of the middle makes the body of politics a freak of nature. Without a middle (chest) the left and right arms can not function, have nothing to connect to, and serves very little purpose. They both fall helplessly to the ground. The middle keeps the left and right grounded, not letting any side gain an unfair upper hand, but allowing both sides to carry out their functions for the good of the body.
Barack Obama is the 44th President of the United States. We know that. Most of us accept it. He has managed to keep most of his campaign promises and those that he hasn't comes as no surprise. Most Americans are intelligent enough to know what can and will work versus what can't and won't. In the humble opinion of one American, I believe that he is doing a pretty good job with what he's been given. He doesn't come off as angry or bitter. Instead, he seems to be methodically and carefully considering the best interests of this nation. George W. Bush is no longer President of the United States. We know that. All of us accept it because he reached his two term maximum. He governed in accordance with the beliefs and ideals of the Republican right. I'm not sure if his governance was motivated by a desire to effectively lead and represent the American public, or to secure a legacy for himself and scrub the stains from the tainted one of his father, Bush 41. I'm still pondering that one.
Although Bush 43 walked out of office and the public eye nearly 120 days ago, residue from his Administration remains. An unstable economy, high rate of home foreclosures, job losses, financial disasters and more, rests heavily upon the backs and minds of many Americans. Obama comes in, assesses the damage, and looks for ways to stop the bleeding until solutions can be found. However, political rancor rips away the band-aid, exposing the deep wound to more infection, until the situation becomes gravely ill.
Who's right? Is it the Republicans who say the stimulus and bailouts will only lead to more financial and economic disasters later down the road? Or the Democrats who say we have to act now or the country goes from a moderate recession to an acute depression? Who do we believe? Who is more sincere? Who seems to genuinely care about the state of America?
Well, after considering all the talk, analysis, press conferences, news articles, blogs, and opinion polls, this American decided to support the Democratic position. No, I didn't do it based on party affiliation or political popularity. I didn't do it because of the "still-quite-popular" President Obama or the influential First Lady Michelle Obama. For me, image was the deciding factor.
Although the Republicans seemed passionate about their position, their reaction to the crisis was superficial. Sure, they took advantage of photo ops and sound bites to oppose the democratic agenda for the "good of our children and grandchildren" years from now. I listened intently to their commentaries. I looked for sincerity and concern. I found little. What I found abundantly was consistent rejection with little or no thought or consideration. The answer to every Democratic proposal was an emphatic no. Now, when people are forced from their homes, struggle to feed their families, lose their jobs, and face hopeless situations daily, partisan wrestling matches and street brawls does not cast a positive light on leaders. The American public depends on elected officials to make their lives better, and when that fails to happen, consequences abound. The heat of battle rises. The civil war rages. Generals and Commanders are clueless and have difficulty devising a winning strategy.
The negativity and bitterness surrounding the Republican party is destroying credibility. Some times less is definitely more. The airwaves are saturated with divisive, venomous rhetoric from the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck, Lou Dobbs, Michelle Bachmann, Dick Cheney, Newt Gingrich and others. Democrats are not much better. They are in the political driver's seat at the moment but they keep looking in the rearview mirror, often suffering avoidable crashes. In the process, the American people suffer. Image is everything. When your words say "I care" and your image says, "so what?" you can best believe that those bearing tainted images will see a political freefall in 2010 and 2012.
AfterThoughts Signing Off...
Saturday, May 16, 2009
How Do You Define The Black Woman?
HOW DO YOU DEFINE THE BLACK WOMAN?
Is she defined by her nose and lips broad or straight, full or thin
or could it be her monster hips which makes her a perfect ten?
Is she known by her famous butt thick and round, petite and flat?
or could it be her peacock strut which lets you know she's all that?
however you see her, let me say that the black woman is well on her way
to becoming phenomenal and it's all good!
Is it by her sassy mouth you define loud and boasting, humble and meek
or her ability to know a played out line she tells you when your rap is weak
maybe you see her as low class or define her as cold and brash
no matter what her complexion and size she's black and you need to recognize
you don't have a clue you see the black woman is whatever she wants to be
fearless and strong, she's got it going on!
Is it her unwillingness to back down which makes you scratch your head and frown?
the black woman is not easily bent she stands her ground and represents
her skin is not what makes her black let me define her while you step back
the black woman is...
From midnight black to almost white nappy or straight, she gets it right
tall or short, fat or thin, it doesn't matter, she's loved by men
brown eyes, green eyes, quiet or loud she gets attention and can draw a crowd
So when you see her give her respect, for she's the best thing you've ever met
she's bold and beautiful, real and precise
she's america's sugar and africa's spice!
by S. Denice Newton
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Join us live on Saturday, May 16, 2009 at 6PM as we talk to some students who have defied odds and are making positive decisions resulting in positive rewards. From college scholarships to computers, these students are being rewarded for a job well done. Also, we will meet Ms. Jacquie Jeffers, a high school teacher using her unique talents to reach her students. We will also present Mr. Daryl Woodard, Executive Director of Smart Choices For Youth,Inc. Mr. Woodard and his organization is making a tremendous difference in the lives of many young people, giving hope to the hopeless and proving that hard work and perseverance really pays off.
Monday, May 11, 2009
Race, Ignorance, and Black Conservatism
When I was a child, I couldn't understand the phrase, "curiosity killed the cat." It just didn't make any sense to me. But as I aged, learned, and matured, I came to realize the full meaning of it. Your curiosity can cause things to be revealed that you may not want to know about. Boy, did I ever experience that this past Friday night.
I was on a particular internet talk radio site when I came across an interesting page. The host called himself Black Conservative. He wore this title proudly, as if it were some sort of banner or high honor. But to each his own. I became curious about this individual being that I'd recently had another black conservative on my talk show who was not only very pleasant, articulate, and intelligent, but a gentleman as well. I expected no less from the one that I'd stumbled upon, regardless of race or political affiliation.
The minute that I began listening to his show, I knew that it would be the type of atmosphere that would be incompatible with my beliefs and personality. The host was on a rant about black conservatives being "right" and black liberals being "wrong." Although this statement stabbed me in the gut, I was willing to listen with an open mind. After all, everyone is entitled to his/her opinion and belief. But after several minutes of listening to partisan garbage, I decided to call in with a question.
The host took my call almost immediately. I held my question after deciding to respond to one that he had posed first. His question was: what has Barack Obama done to help Black America?
This may not be the question exactly, but it was on this line. I began the response in this manner: "It is really unfair to expect President Obama to reverse the many ills plaguing the black community when he' s only been in office a little over 3 months." The host responds, "how much time do you black people need before you can see that Barack Obama is doing nothing for the black community? Well, I'm black and the host is black so therefore, I became baffled and taken aback by this question. You black people? I then asked, "what did George Bush do to help the black community? He then went on this long-winded, voice-raising, ignorance-revealing, unintelligent rant about faith-based initiatives, social programs, etc. that Bush supposedly put forth to help blacks. Hmmm.
During this moment of extreme insanity, I decided not to even try to reduce myself to his level. I could have countered much of what he stated in regards to Bush but he really wouldn't let me get a word in. Furthermore, I wanted to get to my burning question before it got lost in a political abyss. When he took a brief pause and appeared to be coming down from the delusional "conservative" high that he was on, I attempted to ask my question again. Again, he wouldn't allow me. He tried to push me into a corner with the whole Bush did so much more for blacks than Obama is doing. I was done with that issue because his ignorance and arrogance was not going to allow him to listen to reason and logic. I pressed ahead with my question.
Before I could get the question out, he made some foolish remark about me "waking a sleeping giant." His arrogance had no bounds. I was getting a little angry at this point and stated, "Yeah, George Bush did a lot for blacks. He sure had a lot of them killed through the deception and lies that led to the Gulf War." Okay, this really inflamed him. I was through. There was no getting through to this person. When the opportunity finally arose, I kindly responded, "I'm going to hang up now. I can see that we're not going to agree." He continued to press for an argument and I hung up. Those in the chat room that sided with him seemed to think that he "pushed me into a corner" and that I didn't know how to respond to him. They were so wrong. I can't tolerate foolishness. I didn't call in to be controversial, I called in with a question for a black man who claims to be a conservative republican. I wanted an answer; an intelligent answer to the question: "As a black conservative, what do you think about some of the divisive, racist remarks made by those like Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, and others?"
The chat room began to go crazy. Conservatives began jumping all over liberals. I witnessed some of the most vile, vulgar, profane language that I've ever seen. The host continued ranting and raving to every caller that was in opposition to his madness. He started saying things like "you dumb black people put Barack Obama in the White House." Let me back up one moment. He made that particular statement when I was on the line with him. I responded, "black people only make up about 14% of this country's population. If every black in this country voted for Obama, he wouldn't have won the election." I don't remember his response but I'm sure that it was just as ridiculous as all the others.
Anyway, the host continued in his verbal attacks against black liberals. A soft-spoken, intelligent male caller began to challenge the host on his position. The host referred to him as a dumb black. The caller corrected him and said, "I'm not black." The host responds, "you sound dumb so I assumed you were black." Again, the chatroom went wild. The host and supporters in the chatroom began to use the words negro and niggers consistently. No shame. No apologies. The host began to say that blacks need to get off all assistance programs, stop being lazy, find jobs, and support themselves. They don't need programs such as affirmative action he stated.
Although I can agree that it would be ideal for black americans to be self-sufficient without assistance from the government, it is also unrealistic. We are living in some harsh times. People are starving, living in the streets, and stripped of hope. They can't see the forests for the trees. Is it such a bad thing for the government to extend a hand of help to those who find it difficult to help themselves? Do conservatives wish to see children literally starve to death? Do they wish to see the elderly succumb to their diseases and ailments all because they need to get off their lazy butts and get a job? In a nation as rich as this one, these things should not be happening. Just because many of them are filthy rich, it doesn't give them the right to deny the less fortunate access to aid.
Conservatives are quick to claim their "Christianity" and religious beliefs when it suits them. But a real Christian would reach out to those less fortunate. A real Christian has a heart of compassion that it not easily influenced by motives, agenda, or political position. A real Christian would share his vast wealth with others who are without because he is full of love and compassion. The hypocrisy of many "believers" are astounding. Take into account the controversy at Notre Dame. Some are opposing the President's commencement address because of his positions on abortion and stem cell research. They believe that stem cell research kills a child in order to advance science. But they give no thought to Catholic Priests killing a child's innocence to advance sexual perversions. Hyprocrisy at its best.
To sum it all up, I stopped listening to the madness of the Black Conservative's talk show and will never go there again. If I were a conservative, I would have a problem with this idiot representing me. This is one of many reasons that the Republican party is flailing around like fish out of water--politically oxygen deprived. Those that are speaking on behalf of the party are jokes and not taken seriously by anyone with a minimal amount of thinking capacity. They are divisive, mean-spirited, and lack compassion and care. Those little extra taxes that they have to pay in order to help others is the driving force behind their rejection of President Obama.
TO ALL CONSERVATIVES: IF YOU WANT TO REGAIN POWER, BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, AND REACH ALL AMERICANS, NOT JUST RIGHT WING EXTREMISTS, THEN YOU NEED TO ALLOW SOME HEAT TO THAT FROZEN HEART OF YOURS AND LET THE THAWING BEGIN.
Curiosity may have killed the cat, but it didn't kill me. What it did was place my opinion of black conservatives much lower on the political ladder.
AfterThoughts Signing Off..
I was on a particular internet talk radio site when I came across an interesting page. The host called himself Black Conservative. He wore this title proudly, as if it were some sort of banner or high honor. But to each his own. I became curious about this individual being that I'd recently had another black conservative on my talk show who was not only very pleasant, articulate, and intelligent, but a gentleman as well. I expected no less from the one that I'd stumbled upon, regardless of race or political affiliation.
The minute that I began listening to his show, I knew that it would be the type of atmosphere that would be incompatible with my beliefs and personality. The host was on a rant about black conservatives being "right" and black liberals being "wrong." Although this statement stabbed me in the gut, I was willing to listen with an open mind. After all, everyone is entitled to his/her opinion and belief. But after several minutes of listening to partisan garbage, I decided to call in with a question.
The host took my call almost immediately. I held my question after deciding to respond to one that he had posed first. His question was: what has Barack Obama done to help Black America?
This may not be the question exactly, but it was on this line. I began the response in this manner: "It is really unfair to expect President Obama to reverse the many ills plaguing the black community when he' s only been in office a little over 3 months." The host responds, "how much time do you black people need before you can see that Barack Obama is doing nothing for the black community? Well, I'm black and the host is black so therefore, I became baffled and taken aback by this question. You black people? I then asked, "what did George Bush do to help the black community? He then went on this long-winded, voice-raising, ignorance-revealing, unintelligent rant about faith-based initiatives, social programs, etc. that Bush supposedly put forth to help blacks. Hmmm.
During this moment of extreme insanity, I decided not to even try to reduce myself to his level. I could have countered much of what he stated in regards to Bush but he really wouldn't let me get a word in. Furthermore, I wanted to get to my burning question before it got lost in a political abyss. When he took a brief pause and appeared to be coming down from the delusional "conservative" high that he was on, I attempted to ask my question again. Again, he wouldn't allow me. He tried to push me into a corner with the whole Bush did so much more for blacks than Obama is doing. I was done with that issue because his ignorance and arrogance was not going to allow him to listen to reason and logic. I pressed ahead with my question.
Before I could get the question out, he made some foolish remark about me "waking a sleeping giant." His arrogance had no bounds. I was getting a little angry at this point and stated, "Yeah, George Bush did a lot for blacks. He sure had a lot of them killed through the deception and lies that led to the Gulf War." Okay, this really inflamed him. I was through. There was no getting through to this person. When the opportunity finally arose, I kindly responded, "I'm going to hang up now. I can see that we're not going to agree." He continued to press for an argument and I hung up. Those in the chat room that sided with him seemed to think that he "pushed me into a corner" and that I didn't know how to respond to him. They were so wrong. I can't tolerate foolishness. I didn't call in to be controversial, I called in with a question for a black man who claims to be a conservative republican. I wanted an answer; an intelligent answer to the question: "As a black conservative, what do you think about some of the divisive, racist remarks made by those like Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, and others?"
The chat room began to go crazy. Conservatives began jumping all over liberals. I witnessed some of the most vile, vulgar, profane language that I've ever seen. The host continued ranting and raving to every caller that was in opposition to his madness. He started saying things like "you dumb black people put Barack Obama in the White House." Let me back up one moment. He made that particular statement when I was on the line with him. I responded, "black people only make up about 14% of this country's population. If every black in this country voted for Obama, he wouldn't have won the election." I don't remember his response but I'm sure that it was just as ridiculous as all the others.
Anyway, the host continued in his verbal attacks against black liberals. A soft-spoken, intelligent male caller began to challenge the host on his position. The host referred to him as a dumb black. The caller corrected him and said, "I'm not black." The host responds, "you sound dumb so I assumed you were black." Again, the chatroom went wild. The host and supporters in the chatroom began to use the words negro and niggers consistently. No shame. No apologies. The host began to say that blacks need to get off all assistance programs, stop being lazy, find jobs, and support themselves. They don't need programs such as affirmative action he stated.
Although I can agree that it would be ideal for black americans to be self-sufficient without assistance from the government, it is also unrealistic. We are living in some harsh times. People are starving, living in the streets, and stripped of hope. They can't see the forests for the trees. Is it such a bad thing for the government to extend a hand of help to those who find it difficult to help themselves? Do conservatives wish to see children literally starve to death? Do they wish to see the elderly succumb to their diseases and ailments all because they need to get off their lazy butts and get a job? In a nation as rich as this one, these things should not be happening. Just because many of them are filthy rich, it doesn't give them the right to deny the less fortunate access to aid.
Conservatives are quick to claim their "Christianity" and religious beliefs when it suits them. But a real Christian would reach out to those less fortunate. A real Christian has a heart of compassion that it not easily influenced by motives, agenda, or political position. A real Christian would share his vast wealth with others who are without because he is full of love and compassion. The hypocrisy of many "believers" are astounding. Take into account the controversy at Notre Dame. Some are opposing the President's commencement address because of his positions on abortion and stem cell research. They believe that stem cell research kills a child in order to advance science. But they give no thought to Catholic Priests killing a child's innocence to advance sexual perversions. Hyprocrisy at its best.
To sum it all up, I stopped listening to the madness of the Black Conservative's talk show and will never go there again. If I were a conservative, I would have a problem with this idiot representing me. This is one of many reasons that the Republican party is flailing around like fish out of water--politically oxygen deprived. Those that are speaking on behalf of the party are jokes and not taken seriously by anyone with a minimal amount of thinking capacity. They are divisive, mean-spirited, and lack compassion and care. Those little extra taxes that they have to pay in order to help others is the driving force behind their rejection of President Obama.
TO ALL CONSERVATIVES: IF YOU WANT TO REGAIN POWER, BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, AND REACH ALL AMERICANS, NOT JUST RIGHT WING EXTREMISTS, THEN YOU NEED TO ALLOW SOME HEAT TO THAT FROZEN HEART OF YOURS AND LET THE THAWING BEGIN.
Curiosity may have killed the cat, but it didn't kill me. What it did was place my opinion of black conservatives much lower on the political ladder.
AfterThoughts Signing Off..
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
When This Old World Starts Getting Me Down
In 1979 James Taylor recorded "On The Roof." I don't remember the original recording because I was just a kid and that type of music would not have interested me. But today it has significant meaning. The lyrics are like this: "When this old world starts a getting me down and people are just too much for me to face. I'll climb my way up to the roof of the stairs and all my cares just drift right into space. On the roof, it's peaceful as can be and there the world below don't bother me. No. No. I can't climb to the roof of my home because I'd surely slide off and break my neck! (and back, and legs, and arms, and head). But today has been one of those days that a rooftop experience would have been welcome. The news is depressing. Sure, I could say that I'm not going to watch it, but as a writer, radio host, teacher, and speaker, I have to know what's going on in the world around me. It is a mandate that God Himself has placed on my life. I have to stay in the know. So here goes.I read an article about numerous deaths of teens in Chicago this current school year. 31 in all. Most, if not all, were under 19 years of age. Some of them were the result of "being in the wrong place at the wrong time." Others, petty arguments, robberies, and rival gangs. As I scrolled through the photos of those killed, I couldn't help but think about the doctors, lawyers, business owners, CEOs, Congress and Senate members, mothers, fathers, teachers, preachers, and Presidents that lie fatally wounded in the streets--never to fulfill a dream or leave a legacy. My heart ached. My eyes filled with tears. Still think there's no need for gun control America? Get off your selfish high horses and face reality. No one wants to take your personal guns away but legislation needs to be enacted that will keep assault weapons out of the hands of deranged, criminal-minded, societal devils with absolutely no regard for human life.On a lighter note, it's Bristol Palin again. She has suddenly become an advocate for abstinence. Oh wait. Isn't this the same kid that said (just a few months ago) that abstinence is unrealistic? Hmm. Now she says that it is realistic and that her comments were "taken out of context." How do you take, "abstinence is unrealistic" out of context? You don't. She is her mother's daughter. (Does pants on fire mean anything to you?) She's now taking a message to teen America that they should abstain from sexual relations. Okay, that's fine. They should. But my question is this: why can't a normal, everyday, not-in-the-spotlight teen parent do this thing? Why can't the teen mom that has to go to school, work a part-time job, and raise her baby go before the public with that message? Teens would relate to one like that a lot more than they would the privileged Ms. Palin. Bristol is not struggling. She doesn't have to worry about diapers and formula. She doesn't have to worry about health coverage. So is her motive to simply influence others not to take her path? Is it to warn others about the inconveniences and hardships attached to raising a baby? Is it a genuine caring for the physical and emotional well-being of other teens? Nah, I don't think so. I see a much bigger motive peeking from behind the clouds. Surely some cold, hard cash can't hurt. Who would dare believe that Ms. Palin is doing this on a volunteer basis because her heart is so big? Hmm. Let me think. Could another motive be...should I say it?...Yeah, I'm gonna say it...a means of furthering mommy's political agenda? Now that strikes home for me! That whole, "abstinence is unrealistic" comment clashed with mommy's "conservative values." After all, the Gov. preaches abstinence. Or does she? Maybe it only pertains to other Americans and not those in her family. Anyway, do your thing Bristol. Whatever that is.Ms. Prejean is seen topless and in her undies in photos. She may even lose her crown. Oh, say it ain't so! Not the super Christian that shocked America with her bold statement regarding gay marriage. She feels that she's being targeted by those who didn't appreciate her statement. Okay, she could be on to something there. But that's not the problem. The problem is lies Carrie! When you decide to compete for a crown, you're asked about morals and whether you've ever been photographed partially nude or nude. Well, obviously you answered in the negative because you competed. Being opposed to gay marriage and abortion does not a Christian make. Sorry to disappoint you. You have to be a true follower of God, worship Him in spirit and in truth, and walk according to His Will. Pick up a bible. It's all there.More lives lost in Iraq and Afghanistan. More violent crimes in America. More homes lost. More jobs lost. More companies forced out of business. Hopelessness and despair is gaining a stronghold in many lives. That's the news of the day."I'll climb my way up to the top of the stairs and all my cares just drift right into space. On the roof, its peaceful as can be and there the world below don't bother me." I've got to find me a roof...AfterThoughts Signing Off
Friday, May 1, 2009
Malignant Cancers of Black America: Drugs and Gangs
Please join me Saturday, May 2, 2009 at 6PM on "AfterThoughts With S. Denice Newton for a thorough, intense, conversation regarding drugs and gangs. My special guest is S. Beth Atkin, an award-winning author and advocate for former gang members. Join us and hear references to real-life stories of gang violence and guns. Also joining us is Rehab Counselor and Qualified Professional Ms. Rhonda Dunning who will give us some insight into the mental, physical, and psychological ramifications of drug usage
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)